Is There a "Logical Problem" of Second Language Acquisition?

Authors

  • Lydia White

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v2i2.460

Abstract

Arguments for universal grammar (DO) in generative theory are based on the so called "logical problem of language acquisition." The nature of the problem becomes apparent when we consider the end product of the acquisition process and compare this to the input data, which do not seem sufficiently rich or precise to allow the learner to work out all the complexities of the adult grammar, unless one assumes the availability of certain innate principles (DO). In this paper, I will suggest that this orientation is also useful when one comes to consider second language acquisition. If we focus on the successful second language (L2) learner, it would appear that he or she will also achieve complex knowledge of the L2 which goes well beyond the input. This suggests that DO might have a role to play in L2 acquisition as well, and raises the question of whether the way that DO has operated in the Ll has any effects in L2 acquisition. I will briefly look at current L2 research that presupposes a DO framework, as well as suggesting some directions for further research.

Downloads

Published

1985-06-26

How to Cite

White, L. . . . . . . . . . . (1985). Is There a "Logical Problem" of Second Language Acquisition?. TESL Canada Journal, 2(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v2i2.460

Issue

Section

Articles